Food Processing Company Cuts Nitrogen Costs by 62%
How data logging revealed a dramatically over-sized system recommendation
The Challenge
A major Sacramento food processing company with 800+ employees was experiencing rising costs with their delivered nitrogen cylinders. They consulted with three national equipment vendors, all of whom recommended systems between 450-550 SCFM capacity based on estimated usage calculations.
Industry-standard sizing approach:
- Estimate consumption based on production capacity
- Add 30-40% safety margin “to be safe”
- Recommend largest system in budget range
The quotes ranged from $215,000 to $285,000 for installation.
Our Measurement-First Approach
Before making any recommendations, we installed data logging equipment for 30 days to measure actual nitrogen consumption across their entire operation.
What we discovered:
- Peak demand: 182 SCFM (during maximum production shifts)
- Average demand: 127 SCFM (typical operations)
- Night/weekend: 15 SCFM (minimal baseline for preservation systems)
- Seasonal variation: 45% higher demand during harvest season (Sept-Nov)
The national vendors had recommended systems 2.5-3x larger than needed.
The Right-Sized Solution
Based on 30 days of actual consumption data, we designed a system sized for real-world needs:
- Primary generator: 200 SCFM PSA system (handles peak + 10% buffer)
- Smart controls: Turn-up/turn-down capability matching demand
- Seasonal optimization: Efficient operation year-round
- Emergency backup: Cylinder connection for absolute redundancy
Investment: $68,000 installed
- Saved vs. national quote: $147,000 (68% reduction in capital cost)
- Operating cost: $12,300/year vs. $55,400/year delivered nitrogen
- Annual savings: $43,100/year
Results & ROI
Financial Impact:
- Capital savings: $147,000 (avoiding over-sized system)
- Operating savings: $43,100/year (vs. delivered nitrogen)
- Payback period: 18 months
- 10-year NPV: $387,000
Operational Benefits:
- Never run out during peak production
- Consistent purity for food safety compliance
- No delivery delays or scheduling
- Real-time monitoring and alerts
Reliability:
- 99.7% uptime over 14 months of operation
- Zero production delays due to nitrogen shortage
- Predictive maintenance prevents issues
The Right-Sizing Difference
If they had chosen the national vendor’s 500 SCFM recommendation:
- Wasted capital: $147,000
- Excess energy consumption: ~$18,000/year
- Oversized compressor wear
- Inefficient cycling and maintenance
With our measured approach:
- Perfect capacity for actual needs
- Efficient operation at optimal load
- Lower maintenance costs
- Maximum ROI
Key Takeaway
“We almost spent $215,000 on a system 3x larger than we needed. The 30-day data logging cost us $1,500 but saved us $147,000 in equipment costs plus thousands per year in wasted energy. The measurement-first approach was a game-changer.”
— Operations Director, Sacramento Food Processing
Industry: Food Processing & Packaging Location: Sacramento, CA System Type: PSA (Pressure Swing Adsorption) Installation: Q3 2024
Ready to discover your actual nitrogen needs?
Most companies don’t know their true consumption patterns. National vendors guess and add safety margins. We measure first, then right-size for maximum efficiency.
Free assessment includes:
- 30-day data logging of actual consumption
- Peak demand analysis
- Seasonal variation mapping
- Custom system sizing recommendation
- ROI calculator with your actual numbers
Schedule Your Free Assessment or call (916) XXX-XXXX
Ready to Learn More?
Schedule a free assessment to see how much you could save with right-sized nitrogen generation.